ISLAMABAD (PEN) : A U.S. District Court judge has issued a temporary restraining order halting the Trump administration’s move to revoke Harvard University’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). This decision provides a brief reprieve for the Ivy League institution and its international student body amid escalating tensions between the university and the federal government.
Background of the Dispute
On April 17, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), led by Secretary Kristi Noem, informed Harvard that it could lose its SEVP certification unless it provided detailed records concerning foreign students allegedly involved in “illegal and violent activities.” The DHS letter also accused the university of fostering a “hostile learning environment” for Jewish students amid ongoing pro-Palestinian protests .
In response, Harvard filed a lawsuit, arguing that the federal government’s actions were retaliatory and infringed upon its First Amendment rights, including academic freedom and free speech. The university emphasized that the revocation would disrupt the education of over 6,700 international students and undermine its research initiatives .
Court’s Ruling
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs granted Harvard a two-week stay on the policy, acknowledging the potential for “immediate and irreparable harm” if the decision were enforced before scheduled graduation ceremonies and final assessments. Hearings on the matter are scheduled for May 27 and May 29 .
Implications of the Decision
The temporary injunction preserves Harvard’s access to SEVIS, the government database essential for enrolling international students and maintaining their visa statuses. Without SEVIS certification, Harvard would lose its ability to legally host international students, who constitute a significant portion of its student body .
The Trump administration has indicated it may appeal Judge Burroughs’ ruling. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson criticized the judiciary’s involvement, stating that “unelected judges have no right to stop the Trump Administration from exercising their rightful control over immigration and national security policy” .
Broader Context
This legal battle is part of a broader conflict between the Trump administration and elite universities. The administration has previously frozen or canceled significant federal funding for institutions like Columbia University, Cornell University, and Northwestern University, citing concerns over antisemitism and demands for policy reforms .
Harvard’s international students, who hail from various countries, have expressed fear and frustration over the uncertainty surrounding their legal status and academic futures. In an op-ed, three international students highlighted the broader implications of the administration’s policies, warning that such actions threaten the foundational American values of free speech and inclusive opportunity .
Looking Ahead
As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for the autonomy of academic institutions and the rights of international students in the United States. The scheduled hearings later this month will determine the next steps in this high-stakes legal and political confrontation.
