ISLAMABAD (PEN) : A seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, is set to begin suo moto hearing on six IHC judges’ letter alleging meddling in judicial affairs today (Wednesday).
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Musarrat Hilali, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan are also part of the bench.
In the latest development, Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan and the Lahore High Court Bar Association (LHCBA) have filed similar petitions to join proceedings.
The apex court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution has extraordinary power to assume jurisdiction over any “question of public importance with reference to the enforcement of any fundamental rights.”
Under this article, it can summon any person, government officials or document or record from any government department. The SC may assert jurisdiction either on the basis of a petition filed in the court by any party, or on its own motion referred to as a suo moto notice.
Earlier, a three-member committee comprising the chief justice and the two senior most judges Justice Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar decided in favour of taking suo moto notice. After the legislation introduced by the PDM-led coalition government, the formation of benches and subjects like suo moto notice are decided by this institutional panel.
Interesting developments come as the federal cabinet last week approved the formation of an inquiry commission, headed by retired Chief Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani – a respected jurist known for his independent views.
PM-CJP meeting
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif – accompanied by Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar and Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan – had met Chief Justice Isa in the past week where Justice Shah and Supreme Court Registrar Jazeela Aslam assisted the country’s top judge.
During the meeting, the two sides agreed to form a commission to investigate the concerns of interference in judicial affairs under the Pakistan Commissions of Inquiry Act, 2017, which was followed by the announcement that retired Justice Jillani would conduct the investigation.
However, the decision was criticised by some circles, especially the PTI, arguing that the chief justice shouldn’t have met the prime minister and that the apex court must lead the probe by taking a suo moto notice, as, according to them, the government being the accused party should not lead the process.
Lawyers hail commission decision
But the top representative bodies of lawyers at the national and provincial level had welcomed the formation of inquiry commission, expressed their complete trust in retired Justice Jillani and rejected the demand made by those associated with the PTI, which called for the resignation of Chief Justice Isa and IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq.
The six IHC judges had said in the letter addressed to the Supreme Judicial Council that “it is imperative to inquire into and determine whether there exists a continuing policy on part of the executive branch of the state, implemented by intelligence operatives who report to the executive branch, to intimidate judges, under threat of coercion or blackmail, to engineer judicial outcomes in politically consequential matters.”
Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz had signed this controversial letter.
Meanwhile, Jillani in his letter addressed to the prime minister thanked him as well as the chief justice and Justice Shah for expressing their confidence and assigning the task. He, however, noted that the matter was related to the Supreme Judicial Council, which should look into that.